Whilst this question is challenging and confronting, it’s vital that we consider the issue of the relevance of schooling today and whether it is meeting the needs of our students.
According to iconic author Seth Godin, “Compulsory schooling was designed for the industrial age. Large-scale education was not developed to motivate kids or to create scholars. It was invented to churn out adults who worked well within the system stop scale was more important than quality, just as it was for most industrialists.”
Schools, as we know them, have been around in their current format for well over 100 years. According to Godin, our grandfathers and great-grandfathers built schools to train people to have a lifetime of productive labour as part of the industrialised economy. And it worked. We have had several generations of productive, fully employed workers. But are they serving the purposes of our students today?
Whilst many school leaders and perhaps even more school staff, will complain of change fatigue, many other industries have experienced transformations far more radical than we’ve witnessed in education. Schools today, with a few additional technological tweaks, broadly resemble the classrooms of a century ago. One expert adult out the front of a group, endeavouring to transfer skills and knowledge to an homogenous group of waiting recipients. The size of the group, their readiness and eagerness may have fluctuated but the basic structure remains.
Radical transformations have occurred in industries including banking, retail, publishing, accommodation and transportation. Think eBay, Amazon, Airbnb, UBER and the ATM, when was the last time you queued to talk to a teller at the branch of your bank?
Given the changes in those other industries and developments in technology, why haven’t schools as we know them changed more? There are a number of reasons.
Education is important. What we do in schools has a long-term impact on broader society. Put simply, we can’t afford to experiment with young lives and we are therefore risk averse. Our current schooling system is good. Despite headlines in the popular press, most schools are achieving good results and making a positive contribution to their communities. However, good is the enemy of great. Achieving good results leads to complacency and undermines the need for radical change.
Change fatigue is also a contributing factor. Schools constantly feel like they are changing and this presents as stress and anxiety. As a result, school leaders tread carefully and conservatively, in planning change processes and opt for incremental change rather than transformational change.
A further factor contributing to a conservative approach is that everyone is an expert because everyone has been to school. Parents and the broader community judge schools and their effectiveness, based on their recollections, from their own school experience. This myopic approach contributes to schools preparing students for our pasts, rather than their futures. Significant change often takes a giant leap that can’t be achieved through incremental steps.
The final factor, and it hurts me to confront, is that one of the purposes of schooling, in its current structure, is to mind children during the day, whilst their parents are working.
In considering whether schools are in fact life dinosaurs, at risk of becoming extinct, I reflect back on my experience as Principal of Kowloon Junior School, in Hong Kong. I was fortunate to lead a collaborative process of designing a new campus to be built for the school’s 900 primary students. Each year level has five classes of 30 students. We had made the transition from teaching the UK National Curriculum to implement the International Baccalaureate’s (IB) Primary Years Program (PYP).
The process included the development of an extensive wish list of facilities to maximise the educational outcomes for 21st century learners. Our dream list included drama and dance studios, music practice rooms, small-group breakout spaces, rooftop playgrounds covered in artificial grass, a vast array of technology and amazing performance and environmental spaces. Each floor on the multi-level structure was designed to accommodate one-year level cohort. Spaces were planned for launching the units of enquiry, frontloading information to the students and facilitating breakout groups as they embarked on their enquiry. The possibilities were endless and exciting!
Attending the opening ceremony for the new campus, I was amazed to see the wish list had been turned into reality. My previous experience with architects and blank sheet wish lists had led me to consider our plans to be aspirational and that the reality of budgets would result in many of our wish list items being deleted. The finished facility is world-class with all of the items on our wish list delivered, way beyond our expectations. Yet I would argue that the building is a dinosaur.
Whilst the building, resources, facilities and furniture are simply amazing, the basic structure is set up along traditional lines. Five experts with other supporting adults facilitating the learning of a cohort of 150 homogenous students. The facility is great but it is a high end, high tech version of the model designed for the industrial age. As John Dewey notes, “If we teach today’s students as we taught yesterday’s, we roll them off tomorrow.” Technology presents amazing potential but must be more than a high-tech chalk and talk, students need to be ‘active learners’ with technology.
Just providing students with access to technology in the classroom is not enough. Schools must ensure that students are skilled in using technology in active ways. It is vital that all students understand how to use technology as a tool to engage in creative, productive, lifelong learning rather than simply consuming passive content. In other words, students should be making things and connecting with others and exploring the world, rather than staring at screens.
John Holt highlights the point as follows, “We can best help children learn, not by deciding what we think they should learn and thinking of ingenious ways to teach it to them, but by making the world accessible to them, paying serious attention to what they do, and their questions and helping them explore the things they are most interested in.”
We must finally put to bed the traditional concept that the teacher is holding the metaphorical jug filled with skills and knowledge ready to fill the empty vessels held by the students. We must move away from the traditional teacher-centred classrooms and utilise technology to change the role of teachers in the classroom. We must move from teachers being mere providers, to finally becoming the facilitators in the process of learning that we have long espoused. The learning must become irresistibly engaging to capture the interests of students in the digital age.
Malcolm Gladwell, in his award winning book, describes the tipping point as the name given to that one dramatic event moment in an epidemic when everything can change all once. I believe we are fast approaching a tipping point in education for the following reasons:-
- technology provides abundant, free and easy access to information
- multimedia drenched students have shortened attention spans and more difficult to engage
- families are time poor and many are under financial pressure
- schools are preparing students for roles that haven’t been invented yet
- proliferation of online learning provides access to free education
- many schools are exploring ‘flipped’ classrooms
- many homes and classrooms have abundant access to technology and
- many educators are acutely aware of the need to change and are frustrated
I’m not certain what our ‘tipping point’ will be, however I am certain that schools as we know them today ARE Dinosaurs and are at risk of becoming extent.
I encourage school leaders to be brave and take some leaps or they run the risk of becoming obsolete, if not extinct.
Godin, Seth, “Stop Stealing Dreams”, 2012
Gladwell, Malcolm, “The Tipping Point”, 2000